(thanks to pixabay and Arcaion for this photo)
You know the commander in chief is suffering from a massive conflict of interest: he is losing half a million dollars a day because his hotels are almost all closed by the current pandemic. So he is pulled by his private business interests to try to open things up again as soon as possible. At the same time, all the public health people are telling him many more will die if we don’t get this thing under control. So the Republicans are trying to hand him control (through Mnuchin) of a half trillion dollar slush fund that he can freely draw from. Who has our best interests at heart? Anthony Fauci, who seems to have disappeared from the daily briefings. “Be wary then; best safety lies in fear.”
(cartoon courtesy of pixabay)
Let’s start with a federal “shelter in place” order– get serious, people. Voluntary, at first. If not working, make it mandatory (by then the scale of the pandemic will have become obvious.)
50,000 ventilators at $50K apiece is $2.5 billion– peanuts to the US government. Surely they would offer a quantity discount for such a large order? Add another $500 million for training. After it’s over, put them in mothballs for the next time. It won’t be long before we need them again.
The states simply cannot do this kind of thing when they are required to balance their budgets every year. The US government is uniquely positioned to get in front of this pandemic and order the equipment. For staff, you add all the doctors and nurses in school right now, plus recruit laid-off baristas to do the grunt work like emptying bedpans.
There are also many retired medical people (like me) who could be coaxed back to work by offering free malpractice insurance and other goodies, like a Good Samaritan clause. A lot of them are older (I’m 65) but some could still be recruited.
What’s wrong with this back-of-the-envelope calculation? Oh, too forward-looking. Never mind.
(Enlarged from a post to the comments line from an article about the ventilator shortage in the Washington Post.)
photo courtesy of Kevin_Snyman through pixabay
This quote comes from an article in today’s Washington Post. This is something I have feared for years, ever since I started this blog. Other than one or two unpleasant comments, I haven’t been “hated” yet. But I see it could happen to me, just as it happened to everyone who has courted exposure through controversial comments, or even just put themselves out there as a friendly face.
Like Cassandra, I can see the inevitable and I don’t want it to happen (and no-one believes me anyway). Therefore, my posts will continue to be few and far between. I’m sorry I ran out of old photographs to post (I didn’t really run out, but they got harder and harder to find unique images….) So while I may post something now and then, when the urge strikes me, it may not be something that looks controversial to you– just to me.
Apparently the route to having many followers on the net is to be as controversial as possible. That’s not my way. So to the fifty or so people who claim to be following me: Keep your head down until you’re ready to fire.
Why didn’t I post this before? Who, other than us, cares about us? Who even knows we exist? No-one but us and God.
From 12/17/2018: Comment appended to a column in the Times discussing the “tragedy” of human extinction and whether it is undesirable or even avoidable:
Tragedy? In the vast, unknowable stretches of time and space, planets, solar systems, galaxies are created and destroyed regularly without our consideration of the theatrical appeal of this happening. Funny that one would even imagine that the existence of humanity matters in the vastness of the cosmos and the seemingly eternal progression of time.
From our point of view, it’s a disaster. From the point of view of Earth, it’s just another dust-off.
The above comment drew the response below (and many other responses, less notable):
@David All true. However. We are born to care. It is in our wiring that we exist and that we must do everything to continue our existence. And then there is pain and suffering and conflict. It is without meaning that our lives are constructed on this basis. We don’t have anything to do with the fact of our existence and we are doomed to care. If you had asked me, and no one did, I would have done a much better job.
I liked this one best:
[@David] I too consider our survival to be without significance except in our own minds. I am a bit concerned, however , with the future of my dog who has done no wrong.
(photo courtesy of pixabay.com)
This comment comes from the Washington Post and is signed by “Barb against Tyrants”: (the post they commented on was by Jennifer Rubin)
There was something said in the new Parnas audio recording, that is much more significant beyond the discussion of the Ambassador, which meets our legal definition of Treason
“During that discussion, Trump asks a person who appears to be Parnas how long Ukraine would “last in fight against Russia.” Parnas says “without us, not very long,” and another person chimes in, “about 30 minutes.” Months later, Trump would try to cut off military aid to Ukraine.” https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/25/politics/recording-trump-lev-parnas-igor-fruman-ukraine-ambassador/index.html
This quote and Trump’s subsequent actions constitute treason. After that dinner conversation and through the next year Trump CONTINUED conspired with multiple people, both Americans and foreign nationals, in an attempt to aid Russia advance their invasion of Ukraine to diminish Ukraine’s defenses and in doing so directly worked against US National Security. Trump continued with a clear understanding of the consequences of his actions..
Please reopen the Impeachment inquiry in the House NOW and add Treason.
(photo taken by me; I think it’s a buzzard circling over our house.)
We already know that no matter what the Democrats say, the Republicans, to a man, will not vote to convict him for abuse of power, bribery, extortion, violation of the election laws (foreign assistance), and violation of the laws around impoundment of Congressionally mandated appropriations. Not even if he stepped out on Fifth Avenue and shot someone in front of a hundred witnesses.
So why are the Democrats so engaged in reciting their evidence of bribery/extortion of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky? They’d do just as well playing a loop of someone reciting the “transcript” of that notorious July 25, 2019 phone call. The truth is that the Democrats are just as deluded in their way as the Republicans. They think that by going through lawful, reasonable, logical steps of investigation, discovery, subpoena of witnesses and documents, and by reciting their evidence for all to hear, that they are going to accomplish something. The Republicans are deaf to their pleas.
It is clear that the only thing the Democrats can hope to accomplish is to defeat [redacted] at the polls in November. Until then, Don the Con will continue to run wild, doing anything he pleases (as long as it doesn’t break with his base). He’s quite likely to be even worse than he was before the impeachment, based on his mistaken idea that he has been publicly exonerated and that he can now exact revenge on those who opposed him. Don’s base is sure to approve of cruelty towards the disenfranchised, and they won’t notice the moves he takes to consolidate his power and further subvert the power of votes, the ability of people to vote, and the effect of the House’s attempts to control his excesses.
We can hope that there is substantially more evidence that can be uncovered regarding Don’s extortion in Ukraine; already, it seems that there has been a steady drip of relatively minor but damning revelations. The latest is audio of Don saying, “Get her out tomorrow” [Marie Yovanovich, former ambassador to Ukraine, appointed under Reagan] — but a year before she actually left. Why would Don not just fire her way back then?? He surely had the authority. Either he did not know that he had that ability (which is entirely possible, given the depth of his ignorance) or there was some political reason he couldn’t do it.
In the same audio recording (courtesy of Lev Parnas, under indictment for funnelling foreign campaign money to Republican candidates) Don has a number of other disturbing things to say, but they are overshadowed by his reaction to Parnas’ claim that Yovanovitch bad-mouthed him. Parnas is heard saying that Yovanovitch told people Don was surely going to be impeached, and to “just wait for it”. He immediately says “Get her out tomorrow”, but oddly she was not forced out until May 2019. Why did he wait? We don’t know. Perhaps his aides just slow-walked it without realizing the true motives behind the bad-mouthing: they didn’t know that she was threatening to prevent the corrupt moves that Giuliani’s group wanted to make (a money-making scam, probably).
Someone said, “The Republicans will not accept being democratically defeated at the polls. They will abandon democracy instead.” This is my greatest fear: Don the Con will narrowly lose the Electoral College (and lose the popular vote by 3 or 4 millions) and will then attempt a coup.
If he wins in November, look for a steady erosion of democracy through targeted voter suppression. Look for additional chaos in our relations with foreign governments. Look for expansion of the federal government’s support of religious conservative groups, particularly in subsidies for private religiously-oriented schools. Look for further deterioration in public schools as a result.
Look for economic problems: the stock market is way overdue for a “correction” after ten years of relatively steady growth. The Great Recession made things worse for a third of America, and the 1% profited by it handsomely. Another recession will add to the losses sustained by lower-income people in the last one, from which they have not fully recovered. The economy is dangerously imbalanced: wealth inequality is the worst it has been since the Great Depression, and as a result, workers can’t buy more stuff to make the country grow.
Don’t look for relief on prescription drug prices because the pharmacy lobby has Don the Con completely under its spell. Pharmaceutical companies have spent more on lobbying than any other, with the possible exception of military suppliers. As a result, there will be no action to relieve price increases, which have averaged double inflation or more for years.
Look for more military spending. Look for attempts to reduce Social Security spending and no action on taxes other than another phony “tax cut”.
Look for open warfare in the courts between Republican and Democratic viewpoints on every subject imaginable. Eventually, the courts will force Don the Con to reveal his income taxes based on a plain reading of the law– or else they will go completely off the rails, declare the law unconstitutional, and risk being impeached later. Someday the court cases over Don McGahn’s testimony (and many others) will be resolved. If they are forced to talk, another impeachment could be in the offing. If not, there will be further consolidation of the President’s powers and regardless of who is elected thereafter, there will be a distinct risk of fascism ascendant.
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
On columnist Jennifer Rubin’s “hatred” of Don the Con (she denies hating anyone, but you know she doesn’t like him):
Ask yourself: why does Rubin oppose Trump? Not because he is pursuing constitutional means to effect policy changes in American government (he’s not). It’s because he breaks the rules we all agreed to follow.
She opposes him because he is offensive to everyone not like him. He has mocked, in the most offensive terms, anyone who criticizes him.
She opposes him because he uses improper and disproportionate means to get his way. He tries to threaten, bribe, or extort anyone in the way of his policy choices who tries to stop him.
She doesn’t oppose him because he’s conservative– he’s not, and she is, but that’s not the point.
She opposes him because his behavior is offensive. His policy choices are cruel and likely to exacerbate the wealth inequality which cripples American growth (how can workers buy more stuff when their salaries have not risen against inflation in 40 years?)– but that’s not why she opposes him.
She opposes him because he says offensive things; he calls “never Trumpers” “human scum”– why?
Trump thinks he can do anything he wants, and if someone tries to stop him, he will not admit defeat when he’s overmatched. He instead tries to overpower them through improper means: insults, threats, bribery, extortion, blackmail, veiled threats of violence, enlisting actually violent ultra-right-wing extremists, and worse.
When Obama with-held Congressional monies, he went through all the legal procedures and did it publicly; when Trump with-held money, he did it secretly, without explaining why, in violation of laws established after Nixon tried the same chicanery.
I don’t think Rubin is embarrassing. What embarrasses me is that I have to admit that I’m an American under Trump’s government. Opposing Bush II’s policies was a matter of liberal vs conservative– they thought his policy choices were wrong. But opposing Trump himself is a matter of taste: he’s disgusting, and his behavior is illegal.
Trump is a liar, a con man and a crook.
On the Republicans saying “I’d rather be a Russian than a Democrat”:
Those Russians they admire have some problems at home:
One, life expectancy has dropped, partly due to alcohol abuse and partly due to malnutrition.
Two, their abortion rate is “one of the highest in the world.” Try that on for size, right after remembering that the biggest single-issue Trump voters are anti-abortion activists.
Three, their “gun rights” are non-existent. Private citizens cannot purchase semi-automatic weapons easily. The second biggest single-issue voter group is the Second Amendment types who would be horrified if they faced the restrictions on gun ownership that are in place in Russia and have been for many years. The so-called “Russian NRA” is a front group for spies trying to infiltrate conservative groups here in the USA, like Maria Butina (who has been deported).
I think that if people like Tucker Carlson and Newt Gingrich were to publicly face the Russian abortion rates and gun non-rights, the popularity of the phrase “I’d rather be a Russian than a Democrat” would drop precipitously. Not going to happen, I know, but it does further lower their standings in the eyes of people who keep their eyes open to everything that is really going on.
The Russians are a great threat to democracy, and to the United States (whom they rightly blame for the disastrous collapse of the USSR and privatization that caused instant billionaires and instant poverty for the masses– remember Putin still has nostalgia for his KGB days)…
Democracy faces tremendous threats both from within and without. Russia and China are both capable of destroying the US, not by war, but by propaganda (Russia) and by commerce (China) .
The Republicans are playing with fire when they flirt with Putin. Fascism is contagious.
Someone said, “Republicans will not accept being democratically overthrown. They will destroy democracy instead.” If Trump receives a narrow loss this November, he might attempt a coup. Try sleeping tonight while thinking about that.









