Skip to content

High attack rate of COVID-19 on Diamond Princess supports aerosol transmission: MedRxiv

2020-08-05
em coronavirus from NIAID– CC license

This new post on MedRxiv dated July 13 and posted July 15 uses a mathematical model to estimate the chances of the attack rate being caused by fomite transmission, droplets, or aerosols– and decides that aerosol transmission of the SARS-COV-2 virus contributes significantly to infection and disease with COVID-19.

To recap: the cruise ship Diamond Princess embarked on January 20, 2020 with a single (later identified) case of COVID-19. By the time the ship was emptied (after a quarantine that ended February 18), of  “3,711 passengers and crew on board, there were 621 (17%) symptomatic and asymptomatic people with positive COVID-19 tests. ” (Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, https://www.cebm.net/study/covid-19-transmission-of-the-novel-coronavirus-onboard-the-diamond-princess-cruises-ship/)

Apparently, not all of the people on board were tested, but at least 3,000 were checked at some point. It is fairly clear from other information available that the 17% positive rate is an undercount. At least 18% were completely asymptomatic and possibly many more. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32183930/)

Another study gives 696 people infected by February 25 and 7 deaths by March 2. (9 more cases identified by March 5 are given as “negative cases.”) This study also points out that the passengers tended to be older; it seems that none were children. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118348/)

From the abstract of the new study:

 The current prevailing position is that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is transmitted primarily through large respiratory droplets within close proximity (i.e., 1-2 m) of infected individuals. However, quantitative information on the relative importance of specific transmission pathways of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (i.e., droplets, aerosols, and fomites across short- and long-range distances) remains limited….

We developed a framework that combines stochastic Markov chain and negative exponential dose-response modeling with available empirical data on mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 dynamics and human behaviors, which informs a modified version of the Reed-Frost epidemic model to predict daily and cumulative daily case counts on the ship…..

 Mean estimates of the contributions of short-range, long-range, and fomite transmission modes to infected cases aboard the ship across the entire simulation time period were 35%, 35%, and 30%, respectively. Mean estimates of the contributions of large respiratory droplets and small respiratory aerosols were 41% and 59%. Short-range transmission was the dominant mode after passenger quarantine began, albeit due primarily to aerosol transmission, not droplets. Interpretation Our results demonstrate that aerosol inhalation was likely the dominant contributor to COVID-19 transmission among passengers aboard the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship…..

these findings underscore the importance of implementing public health measures that target the control of inhalation of aerosols in addition to ongoing measures targeting control of large droplet and fomite transmission, not only aboard cruise ships but in other indoor environments as well.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.13.20153049v1

When we say “aerosol” transmission we are talking about tiny droplets, less than 10 microns in diameter (the virus itself is 50-200 nanometers, or 0.05-0.2 microns) and these aerosols can float on air currents for long periods of time, from a few minutes to an hour or so. The chances of a 10 micron drop containing a virus are not individually great, but with thousands of these drops being emitted every second during breathing and talking, there is a good chance that some will contain infectious material. Epithelial cells from a person’s airway will have many viruses attached to them.

These aerosols can land anywhere on a targeted person and be breathed into the lungs or deposited on the eyes (I’m just saying that to sound scarier.) The point is that exposure to aerosols is scary.

The spread of droplets and aerosols can be reduced by masks (I have posted about this before on several occasions; see May 15 on droplet size for example.) So, do wear that mask.

No comments yet

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: