Skip to content

Arithmetic exercise using illegal aliens as numbers– courtesy of Quora and Jeri Cafesin. her lawn was cut quite well with a “foreign” mowing device

2018-11-10

I came across this answer to a Quora question about illegal immigrants and the US economy.  It is old, but highly instructive.  In short, illegal immigrants are a huge positive for the economy, and I mean putting dollars and cents in your pocket (and getting your lawn cut, with no risk of having your throat slashed.)  This answer has been viewed roughly 189 thousand times, and I hope you two will also read it.

Jeri Cafesin, Marketing Strategist (1999-present)

Had some yard work done that required cutting concrete. My gardener gave me a quote of $150 to do the job. I accepted his bid as fair and equitable and we agreed on last Sunday for him to do the work.

He arrived promptly 8:30 Sunday morning and began cutting our concrete patio. He used a small electric saw with a 4” blade, which I thought odd, since the last guy I’d seen cut concrete had a major power saw that had to be held with both hands and came with a water supply to keep the blade cool.

Gardener struggled to cut a mere 20” of concrete for over 5 hours. He left once, to buy new blades for his little saw. He did not take a lunch break. In fact, he took no breaks at all.

Ninty-four degrees at mid-day when I brought him some ice water. Sweat dripped down his face and cut brown lines in the concrete chalk covering his skin. He gave me a crooked-tooth grin of thanks, took a long drink then wiped his forehead with the back of his hand. “Caliente!” (Hot!)

I nodded agreement and pointed to his little saw. Pequeño (Small), I said, closing the gap between thumb and forefinger. Why so small? Harder to cut the concrete. I spoke in English, as my Spanish sucks, but he got it.

He laughed. You’re right. Yes! Si! Demasiado pequeño (too small). Herramienta incorrecta (wrong tool). He picked up his tiny cutter. Muy caro! Expensive! $100 for herramienta. $35 for blades. Ay, yi yi!

I’m paying him $150 for the job. He’d just spent over that buying equipment to do the work. I was mind boggled. I assumed he had all he needed to do the job when he gave me his bid. He went back to work and I went inside and got the receipt from the equipment rental place I’d visited the previous week. Only $24.99 to rent a jigsaw for 24 hours! At the time I rented the jigsaw, I inquired about renting a concrete cutter. $59.00 for 24 hours. Why hadn’t my gardener just rented the right equipment? He could have got the job done in half an hour and actually made money.

I took the receipt outside and showed it him. Do you know of this place? Just down the road?

He took the receipt and studied the logo at the top of the paper. His expression brightened. Si! Yes! Alquiler de equipos Rentals. Rents. Yes?

Yes! Concrete saw is $59.00 bucks for the day. Taken you 30 minutes to do the job. Why didn’t you rent a saw? Using hand signals and body gestures I somehow communicated.

Ah. No. No rent. Can’t. No license. No seguro (insurance). Not legal here.

Four years running our gardener’s been coming and he is the best gardener I’ve ever had. More than a gardener, he fixes our watering system, landscapes, trims trees, sets fences. He comes every Tuesday around 9:00am, rain or shine, and is on time, every time. He always smiles and waves when we cross paths. He is a stellar model of a dedicated hard worker for our children, and the community at large.

Yet, he can not get a Green Card.

His company won’t sponsor him. He has no legal relatives here. He is not a refugee. Even if he could get one, the process of applying and then waiting for the Card takes years. My gardener needs, and in fact, has work now. He can’t wait years to get U.S. approval to work for a living.

Why doesn’t he leave his job for Americans and just go back to Mexico?

I had three other bids on the concrete work I needed. A neighborhood contractor quoted me $1,600 to do the job. A mason didn’t want the job because it was 20 miles from his location and not worth the trip. A local handyman quoted $800, but couldn’t start the job for over two months, and required half upfront to hold my time slot. All were licensed, bonded, U.S. citizens.

Until our conversation last Sunday, I had no idea my gardener was here illegally, and driving without a license. The man is probably in his early 30s. He’ll die young from hard labor, lack of medical care, working with poor or improper equipment, like breathing toxic concrete dust without a mask, carcinogenic construction materials, garden poisons. If he is graced with children, and I hope he is, and will pass on his excellent work ethic to them, he still will not be granted U.S. citizenship, and is at risk of deportation. Like many illegals lately, he could end up having to take his American children back to live in the Mexico he left for a ‘better life.’

Sunday alone, our gardener put over $150 into the U.S. economy, counting just his little saw and multiple blades. He will buy his food here, pay for his housing here, his utilities, his fuel costs. He lives here, and contributes to our economy with every dollar he spends. He probably pays taxes, as do many illegals working for large corporations. My gardener is an employee of a huge gardening and landscaping company.

Next time you bite into that peach, remember it only costs 39 cents because illegals planting and picking the fruit are cheap labor. (Your iPhone5 is made in China for the same reason, yet Apple is rewarded with tax breaks instead of being kicked out of the country.) Billions in tax dollars and consumer spending in the U.S. by illegals annually, yet they get none of the protections of our citizens. No medicare. No social security or unemployment benefits. No welfare or government handouts. Illegals are invisible here.

I am privileged by birthright for the lifestyle we live, and can provide for our kids. I haven’t a clue, and never want one, how it feels to be so far from home, without ‘inalienable rights.’ But I know one thing for sure—our gardener deserves the ‘better life’ he sought when moving here, the one [ostensibly] available to most citizens who work hard to prosper.

(image courtesy of pixabay.com, from an old engraving long lost to copyrights)

(repeat message: if you see an ad on this page, please report it to me in the comments.  This is because the ads are invisible to me and I am at least curious as to their existence and contents… I hope that this site– wordpress.com– sticks to “plain vanilla” ads but what if it’s of the “meat for go”  variety? [see 1964 movie with the Dave Clarke 5 where this slogan– “meat for go”– was an ad campaign for… meat.])

He who must not be named: “He’s the head of a country and I mean he is the strong head. Don’t let anyone think anything different. He speaks and his people sit up at attention. I want my people to do the same.”

2018-11-09

That’s what he wants.  He wants his people to act towards him the way Kim Jong-Un’s people act towards HIM.  Any deviation and you’re an “enemy of the people” unless you apologize and agree to kill the last traitor.  This from Tony Plank on Quora, quoting an article in politico.com.

(as before, this image comes courtesy of pixabay.com and its original author)

Comments of the Day: “The senate guarantees that minorities cannot be overruled by the majority… the majority can be and often times is overruled by the minority. Would you call that democracy? ” and “This can’t be fixed.”

2018-11-09
os
Germany

@Jo Jamabalaya
You state that the senate guarantees that minorities cannot be overruled by the majority. But what you have now is that the majority can be and often times is overruled by the minority. Would you call that democracy? The Eu tokk different measures to ensure the protection of minorities while at the same time ruling out minority rule. If there are decisions made that do not need unanimous agreement, the there needs to a mjority of votes in the European Council that represent more than at least 50% or as I believe even 60% of the EU population. Apply that to the senate rules in the US and you have mitigated the current diproportinate weight of the the votes.

 

JT

Ridgway, CO

@Todd Huttunen The constitution was compromised by the need to sanction slavery, creating an ever growing bias toward democratic control of the country.

17% of the population controls a majority of the senate.  70% of the senate will be controlled by 30% of the population within a few decades.

The minority Republican party controls two branches of government, since the senate installs the judiciary.  The same minority of our population is additionally given an advantage in choosing the president and enacts gerrymandering to control the House. It appears likely that from the 21st century forward-that if a house divided against itself can indeed stand- a popularly elected president will be a rarity and the senate and judiciary will be “elected” by a shrinking minority of the population that likes to refer to the majority as “elites.”

The Republican minority’s M.O. is to act in anti-democratic bad faith to cheat the majority of Americans.  It refused to allow a popularly elected sitting president of the other party to appoint judges or a Supreme Court Justice.  The senate’s judiciary committee, repreenting a super-minority of voters, ran “Kangaroo” hearings and allowed the unpopular president who badly lost the popular vote to appoint the third branch of government. Those branches together codify voter suppression.  As a “kicker,” they enact  “tax relief”  that increases taxes in “blue” states.

This can’t be fixed.

He who shall not be named has just elevated a man to the office of US AG who disagrees with Marbury vs Madison– The SC decision that has guided our country for over 200 yr. This stance could point the way to an imperial presidency.

2018-11-09

Lancet: Fertility Rate Drops By Half as World Population Nearly Triples Since 1950: Down From 4.7 Children Per Woman To 2.4 But World Has Nearly 8 Billion People Now

2018-11-09

 

The Lancet study was reported, again, by Microsoft News application, and I quote:

The total fertility rate — or the average number of children a woman would have if she lived through all her reproductive years — declined from 4.7 live births in 1950 to 2.4 in 2017.
Meanwhile, the global population has nearly tripled since 1950, from 2.6 billion people to 7.6 billion, the report says. An average of nearly 84 million people have been added to the Earth’s population every year since 1985.

 

Refugees from Central America are Coming North in a Humanitarian Disaster, Not an Invasion, and it is Caused Ultimately by Climate Change

2018-11-09

The phenomenon of refugees fleeing north that we have recently seen is related to climate change.  It is plain.  The temperature is going up and the people in the hottest places are fleeing– Central America is particularly prone to this phenomenon.  People south of the narrow isthmus between the two Americas are probably fleeing south.

Don Lemon, CNN:”The caravan is not the problem… Homegrown killers are the problem. The question is, when are we going to do something about it?”

2018-11-09

Michelle Obama: He who shall not be named’s body language says: “I can hurt you and get away with it.” This is impunity, and it leads to worse and worse behavior when unchecked.

2018-11-09

Michelle Obama has come out with a new book, and AP reports that she writes, (paraphrased): His body language at the last debate, stalking her around the stage, implies: “I can hurt you and get away with it.”  This is the concept of impunity.  When a sociopathic person does wrong and gets away with it (impunity), his or her behavior becomes steadily worse.  This is extremely dangerous in the case of he who shall not be named because he has already gotten away with so much.

We are officially in the Twilight Zone: Our “President” Calls a Column of Refugees an “Invasion” of “Very Bad People” and Appoints His Shill to be US-AG to shut down Mueller, possibly with complete impunity

2018-11-08

As a 64 year old person who sat through the House hearings on Nixon’s obstruction in the summer of 1974, with nothing better to do (I even recorded it) I find that in the twilight of my life I feel a strange sense of jamais vu.  That’s right, the opposite of deja vu.  This is nothing like then.  Compared to this, the Watergate was a “pleasant dream.”

We officially entered the Twilight Zone AGAIN today with the White House repeating the doctored video of a White House aide trying to take the microphone away from a reporter during a press conference with the “President.”  (He’s not a real President– he just plays one on TV.)

This doctored video, independently produced but ?retweeted by official sources, purports to show the reporter doing something he clearly did not do, either to many, many eyewitnesses, or to the original, or to a slowed down close-up.  That the White House press secretary signed on to this obvious fabrication makes it complete: Everyone in the White House is a liar.

The doctored video attempts to back-up the White House’s explanation of why they took away the reporter’s press credentials afterwards– that the reporter TOUCHED the aide in a rude or assaultive (or any other) manner.  That explanation was clearly false to everyone in the room.  The real reason was that the “President” couldn’t handle the reporter’s sharp question asking why Trump called the refugee column advancing north from Central America an “invasion.”  The reporter insisted on repeating the question and Trump simply couldn’t think of an answer that even made a complete sentence.  Trump completely lost his temper and repeatedly demanded that the aide take away the reporter’s microphone.

The reporter politely refused to relinquish the microphone and maintained a firm grip upon his instrument of power.  The aide attempted, without much success, four times to take it away, each time looking back at Trump to see if he would still insist.  Then she ducked down, out of sight of the cameras.

If we’re going to just have a photoplay, as in “Reality TV”, why doesn’t Trump get actors to dress up as reporters and then he can call on them?  I pine for those lost days, over fifty years ago, when President Kennedy handled news conferences on his own and really tried to lie convincingly to the press.  He really tried to make the reporters like him and accept what he was trying to say.  He went into great detail and, when he didn’t know the answer, he’d admit it.  But this “President” can’t even handle five minutes of semi-hostile questions about his bald-faced, logic-free lies.

I suggest that every reporter from now on begin the questions with the same one that he couldn’t handle: Why are you calling a column of refugees an invasion?

Simultaneously, a man named Whitaker is suddenly the Attorney General of the United States.  This makes no sense.  This man has never been confirmed by the Senate to any post at least since 2004 and is obviously a shill for the Donald (he even admitted that he wanted to get a federal judgeship from Iowa, so he was trying to get Trump’s attention.)  Worse, he’s committing an ethical breach by not recusing himself from the Russia investigation because he’s been beating the drums for a year or more about how the special investigator’s office is no good, very bad, really awful.

Whitaker is a lawyer but that doesn’t qualify him to be US AG any more than my having a driver’s license qualifies me for the Indy 500.  He was obviously chosen to shut Mueller down– come to think of it, isn’t that an act of obstruction of justice?

Doesn’t matter.  We’re in the Twilight Zone of impunity.

Scientific American: “The American Economy is Rigged– and What We Can Do About it.”

2018-11-07

Risking repetition, I would like to once again recommend this article by famous/controversial economist Joseph Stiglitz in November’s Scientific American.  I have been harping on the evils of income inequality for years, although I believe capitalism is an essential part of modern society.  The article shows how “unrestrained” (actually, rigged) capitalism contributes to a feedback mechanism that worsens income inequality persistently and iniquitously– how there are two stable equilibria in the basic equations of our capitalism: equal society and grossly unequal (and worseningly so) society.

The problem is not “free markets” but rigging of markets and rules that favor some participants over others, leading to the accumulation of wealth by increasingly powerful entities.  Attempts to control this problem began in the late nineteenth century in America with antitrust legislation, famously promoted by Theodore Roosevelt as the “Square Deal.”  Repeal of Roosevelt’s innovations led to a maximum inequality in 1929 and probably were a major cause of the stock market crash that led to the Great Depression.  Then another Roosevelt, FDR, gave us the “New Deal” that lasted until Nixon’s corrupt dealings brought back rigging of the system.  We all know what happened since then: median income has not increased, even as productivity increased, over the last 40 years, and lower strata have actually gotten poorer during this time.

In fact, with additional thought, we can see that the second equilibrium almost inevitably leads to unstable, overall impoverished societies that are prone to revolution, with disastrous results.  The examples of Soviet Russia (after Imperial Russia collapsed from inequality) and the People’s Republic of China (after Republican China was destroyed by civil war after their relatively “calm” Republican revolution) in the last century show that when inequality reaches an unsustainable extreme (usually only after a long period of declining productivity and overall impoverishment) violent revolution occurs and unspeakable cruelties are visited upon those who previously benefited from and were protected by government.

The only way to prevent this type of disaster is to end the favoritism that accompanies political power amassed by individuals and giant corporations.  For example, the US health system, despite being the most innovative in the world (partly due to capitalism), offers the least bang per buck of all developed societies (all thirty or so countries) in the world.  Americans spend the most money per capita (meaning large payments by a few individuals and inadequate resources for the rest) and get the poorest results in life expectancy and quality of life.  There are always a few outliers who can live to 100 despite being former slaves, but the money spent by rich people on medical care gives them a pronounced advantage.

This failure of our health care system is directly related to the roughly five hundred million dollars a year  and 2732 lobbyists used by medical corporations and groups in lobbying for and against candidates and laws in our government.  This is the rigging of the system that causes bad results– yet it seems impossible to remedy once it has developed.

Nothing could be simpler.  But to convince yourself of that, you need to read the article– it’s not paywalled.