
photo by Manfred Antranias Zimmer courtesy of pixabay.com
The Vedic period in northern India covers the centuries between about 1500 BCE and 500 BCE. In this time, philosophies that form the basis for Brahmanism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism were developed. In this and later posts, I will outline some of the major concepts that inform these philosophies. All of the information in these posts is based on articles in Wikipedia.
The Indus Valley Civilization (also known as Harappan) had, as prominent features, a male and female God and Goddess, veneration of animals and plants, and the use of ritual bathing. There is little or no surviving evidence of written records to help us understand the concepts central to Harappan religion. It was only with the development of a shared oral tradition of documents that these concepts can be traced. The Vedas were initially orally transmitted records that included things that we understand as “historical” and liturgical (religious) documents. Vedas dating back to roughly 1750 BCE were eventually committed to writing by around 500 BCE.
Before the advent of oral or written documents, funerary practices are the most discoverable of the concepts in religion. They involve the burial of human remains, which can be left in place indefinitely and retain traces of their significance. At the start of the Harappan period, bodies were placed in wooden coffins and buried below the earth’s surface with artifacts, known as “grave goods.” These burials remained relatively undisturbed until they were discovered by archaeologists during the last two hundred or so years.
The purpose of grave goods is unclear. They may have been intended to dispose (or prevent re-use) of articles which were closely associated with the deceased, his personal possessions, or items which somehow contained his spirit. They may also have been intended for the use of the deceased in another life. This would imply that the companions of the dead expected him or her to awaken at some point and begin to live again. The purposes only became better characterized when, in Egyptian lore, it was thought that the grave goods were useful to the deceased in his or her afterlife; even foodstuffs were included, indicating that the corpse could become hungry again.
During the early Vedic period, there was an important transition between burial of intact human remains and cremation. This may be in part related to the development of ceremonies involving fire. Fire ceremonies were called “homas” and could include the recitation of mantras and the burning of sacred herbs or other items. Cremation was one form of a fire ritual. The fire was called “Agni” and was considered a god. Fire was used in rites of passage: of birth, marriage, and death.
However, Agni was not the greatest god– that was Indra, king of the gods. Indra was conceived of as the god of thunder and of storms, but also the wielder of lightning. The Rig Vedas (the first chronologically of the Vedas) refers to Indra in over a quarter of its hymns, more than any other god. Indra is described as the god who brings forth rain and slays the demon Vritra, who is the thunderclouds and the ice-god. In general, Indra destroys all obstacles.
There was no consistent hierarchy of gods in Vedic thought. A person could worship any one god without saying the others didn’t exist or weren’t worthy of veneration. This has led to numerous, non-competitive sects within Hindu mythology– devotees of individual gods who do not deny the others. Agni was one of a trilogy: Agni, Indra, and Surya, the creator, maintainer, and destroyer.
The Rig Vedas also describe Varuna, the god who is the guardian of moral law. He punishes those who sin without remorse and forgives those who repent. Varuna is associated with Mitra, who is called the guardian of treaties. Both are also described as aspects of Agni.
All of these gods, including those not mentioned such as Vishnu (“the supreme being” or “the controller of the entire universe”) are aspects of the same ultimate reality or Brahman. In the Hindu denomination of Vaishnavism (or Vishnuism) Vishnu is revered as the supreme deity. Vishnu adopts various incarnations or avatars to protect dharmic principles whenever the world is threatened with destruction.
In Smarta, one of the four major religious traditions of Hinduism, five gods were equally revered: Shiva, Vishnu, Devi or Parvati, Surya, and an Ishta Devata (such as Kartikeya or Ganesha or any personal god of the devotee’s preference.) The thought was to combine all the gods into the realization that everything is based on the single Brahman or ultimate reality.
All of the orthodox schools of Hinduism agree that there is Atman (soul) in every living being. They extended the idea of “living being” to animals as well, suggesting that one should treat animals with the same reverence that one treats other humans. This led to the embrace of vegetarianism and the thought that one should not kill animals for food or sport.
The orthodox Hindu schools differ from the heterodox Buddhism in one particular important aspect. Orthodoxy held that the Atman was one and unchanging. Buddhism disagreed and held that there is no single, unchanging self underlying the phenomena of the world. Buddhism rejected the divine inspiration of the Vedas and held that they were human in origin.
This is a good place to stop for today.

em coronavirus from NIAID– CC license
From the New York Times updates on the coronavirus today:
The New York Times has been keeping a database of coronavirus cases and found that at least 54,000 patients in nursing homes in the US have died from virus, representing 43% of the total deaths in this country. These deaths are out of 282,000 known cases at 12,000 facilities– deaths are 17% of total cases, versus 5% of cases dying in the overall population. At least six nursing homes have had more than 70 deaths each.
The WHO plans to send a new delegation to China next week to further examine the origins of the coronavirus, which is thought to have jumped from bats to an intermediate host sometime in the last year, most likely in the fall. Many of the initial cases were tied to a “wet market” (where live animals are sold for human consumption) in Wuhan, China. However, it is not clear whether that market was the source of the outbreak or merely its first stop.
“In February, a WHO (World Health Organization) delegation led by Dr. Bruce Aylward, specialist with experience fighting polio, Ebola, and other health emergencies, spent two weeks in China…”
“The US and other countries have criticized China over its initial handling of the outbreak, including delays in reporting the first cases to WHO, and for looking to deflect blame for the epidemic on outsiders. The WHO has been reluctant to publicly criticize China, and at times it has praised health officials for providing genetic information about the virus and taking strong action around Wuhan to contain it… Tuesday will mark six months since China reported the first cases of the virus to the WHO.”
“Dr. Tedros said that “the worst is yet to come… I am sorry to say that, but with this kind of environment and condition, we fear the worst.”
The price Gilead has set to private insurers, $520 a vial ($3120 for a course) will apply to uninsured or cash-paying patients as well. Previous reporting about remdesivir has indicated that the drug can be produced for as little as $0.93 a vial in manufacturing costs. The federal government (and taxpayers) spent roughly $70 million to support the development of remdesivir, which was originally intended to treat the Ebola virus. Development was scrapped after a more effective drug was found for Ebola, but it remained in the arsenal since 2015. Here is an article in ACS Central Science dated May 27, 2020 by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) that reviews the development of remdesivir and the basics of the coronavirus SARS-COV-2.

Electron micrograph of SARS-COV-2 virions in vitro
According to worldometer, there were 40,540 new cases of COVID-19 reported yesterday (June 28) in the United States. The total number of cases reported is 2,637,077 and 128,437 deaths. According to Johns Hopkins, there have been 2,562,921 total cases and 125,927 deaths reported in the United States as of 9:00 AM on June 29. The global number of cases reported, according to Johns Hopkins, is 10,195,680, with 502,802 deaths. WHO’s webpage says that there have been 10,021,401 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 499,913 deaths reported to them. WHO also says that, in the US, there were 44,580 new cases reported yesterday, with a total of 2,496,628 reported cases and 125,318 deaths.
The CDC reports 2,545,250 total cases in the US and 126,369 total deaths, with 41,075 new case reports and 885 new deaths. On April 6, there were 43,438 new cases reported, with rates dropping to below 15,000 reports a day by June 1; last weekend, there were two days of over 44,000 new cases reported. CDC also reports 87,696 cases among healthcare providers and 478 deaths. They report a total of 32,297,688 tests performed, with 3,039,503 of them positive, although this is not broken down into antibody vs. antigen tests nor stated whether some people were tested more than once. Since the total of positive tests is larger than the number of people said to be infected, clearly some are antibody tests and some people had more than one test. The page says that 9% of tests were positive.
The New York Times also keeps a database; it reports that “more than 2,564,600 [reported] people in the United States have been infected with the coronavirus and at least 125,800 [are reported to] have died.” Google itself has figures if you search “covid usa tracker” (showing “2.59 M” total reports) and even Bing has a covid page with numbers for the US (2,593,169 total reports) and the world.
There’s no single explanation as to why WHO would report 140,000 fewer total cases than worldometer. Clearly, the data comes from different sources and may be confirmed in different ways.
All the databases show a peak in new cases in early April with a trough at the beginning of June; the graph appears to start rising again in the middle of June. The death rate peaked early in April and stayed high until mid-May. The death rate has not started to rise again as of the end of June. The totals were skewed by the large number of cases in New York and the Northeast; their rates dropped dramatically and are now no longer hiding the fact that the rest of the country is experiencing an uncontrolled increase in cases (though not yet in deaths.)
Death rates have been significantly undercounted in the US and elsewhere, first due to poor availability of tests (especially at first) and second, because of people who died at home without being tested. Tests have increased to about half a million every day in the US, but there are several areas where it is still very hard to get tested. Some locations that offer tests to the public are swamped, with several-hour waiting times; some have closed early after running out of testing materials for the day. Because of incomplete testing, I have used the qualifier “reported” with every statement of the number of cases.
There is not adequate information about who has symptoms and who does not when getting tested, so it is unknown how many asymptomatic people have tested positive. Widespread antibody testing has recently revealed that at least ten times as many people have antibodies as have tested positive for the antigen, suggesting that something like 20 million Americans have had COVID-19. The rate of asymptomatic COVID-19 has been guesstimated at from 30% to as high as 80% (the higher number is based on tests of the guests and staff on a cruise ship.) The rate of “paucisymptomatic” (meaning with minimal symptoms) disease is unknown as well.
Most importantly, the level of contagiousness that people with no symptoms present is unknown but probably significant. This issue is why mask-wearing is so important for the general public– if you have no symptoms yet are contagious for COVID-19, shouldn’t you be wearing a mask to prevent other people from being exposed to your breath and its thousands of microscopic particles full of viruses?
In other news, CBS News (and other sites) are saying that Gilead plans to charge $3,120 to private insurers for a course of remdesivir. For Medicaid, the price will be $2,340; overseas, some generic makers will offer the drug for $600 a course. The company has come under criticism for its pricing policy, in part because (as Public Citizen complained in a tweet) $70 million in taxpayer money was used to help in its development. The drug was originally to be used for Ebola; it was orphaned after a better drug combination was found.
Remdesivir was shown in an early randomized, placebo-controlled study to reduce recovery time significantly, by 31%; the reduction in death rate, while substantial, did not reach statistical significance at two weeks. Dexamethasone was shown to reduce death rates in severe or critical COVID-19 infections significantly, even at a relatively low dose. Dexamethasone is a cheap generic steroid that has been highly useful in other conditions to reduce inflammation.
Treatment with remdesivir and dexamethasone will help reduce the death rate from COVID-19, but only if hospitals are not overwhelmed with a surge in patients brought on by the dramatic increases in new cases.
Another development that will reduce death rates is that the age of people presenting with new infections has dropped significantly. More young people (almost all over 21) have been tested and are positive for acute infection; the reasons for this are not known with any certainty. It is possible that as testing has been expanded, more young people have been included. Florida’s governor blames young people going out to bars for this new surge in his state; he has ordered the bars closed as well as the beaches in Miami-Dade County.
Even if you don’t die from COVID-19, it has increasingly become apparent that you can have a prolonged, debilitating illness very different from the flu. Patients have been reporting prolonged fevers, lassitude, weakness, and shortness of breath with exertion. Some people have permanent lung damage or weakened hearts, even kidney failure. We don’t know how common this extended illness is, but with so many people getting the virus, even a small proportion of debilitated people will have a profound effect on our medical system.
The worst problem and the reason we have uncontrolled spread is that we have a failure of leadership. The man nominally in charge refuses to model good behavior and has never been photographed wearing a mask in public. Instead, he encourages resistance to mask-wearing mandates and retweets hostile, anti-scientific, and sometimes racist material multiple times every day.
If he were to lead by example, we might have the pandemic under control in this country. If he had invoked the Defense Production Act to get testing supplies manufactured, we wouldn’t have spotty availability of tests. If he had encouraged people to follow sensible protective guidelines, we wouldn’t have so many public health officials resigning due to death threats.
The Vedic period in northern India: Part three: the content of the Vedas and post-Vedic texts.

photo by Manfred Antranias Zimmer courtesy of pixabay.com
The word “Veda” in Sanskrit means “knowledge” or “wisdom.” In some contexts, as in the Rigveda, it means “obtaining or finding wealth, property” and in others, “a bunch of grass together” as for a broom or a ritual fire (the “homa” and “yajna” rituals involve sacred fires.)
The Vedas are divided into four groups: the Rigveda (the oldest), the Yajurveda, the Samaveda, and the Atharvaveda. All four Vedic texts include, first, Samhitas, which are collections of mantras (sacred utterances or numinous sounds.) The mantras invoke deities like Indra (the highest deity, analogous to Jupiter) and Agni (the god of fire.) The Samhitas are thought to have been created before any of the other elements.
The second element of each Veda is the Brahmana, a prose text that comments on the rituals and their meanings. The Brahmanas were composed between 900 and 700 BCE. The third element is the Aranyaka or “wilderness text.” These were composed by recluses who retired to the woods to meditate. They contain interpretations of the ceremonies.
The final element is the Upanishad. The Upanishads are philosophical texts, the foundations of Hindu thought. These are by far the best-known of the Veda texts and were the latest to be composed, after 800 BCE.
Additional materials included as corollaries are the later Upanishads and late Sutras (“threads”), “remembered” texts. The Sutras are collections of aphorisms or brief sayings, around which ritual, philosophical, grammatical, or other knowledge areas are developed. There are Sutras within the Brahmana and Aranyaka texts of each Veda as well as in later materials. In some of the Vedas, only quotes survive; in others, the full text is still extant.
Additional texts that developed after the Vedas included the Vedangas, which appeared because the language of the Vedas was too archaic for the people of later times to understand. The Vedangas had six explanatory aspects: phonetics, poetic meter, grammar, etymology and linguistics, rituals and rites of passage, and time keeping and astronomy.
The Parisistas were ancillary texts that covered details of ritual and extensions of the texts of each Veda. The Upavedas (“applied knowledge”) texts covered archery (for the Yajurveda), architecture (for the Rigveda), music and sacred dance (for the Samaveda), and medicine (for the Atharvaveda.)
There are some very consequential post-Vedic texts that we will describe here. The first is the Mahabharata, the second the Ramayana. Both are epics that describe legendary events but are regarded as historical by Hindus. Additional post-Vedic texts are detailed later.
The Mahabharata tells the struggle between two groups of cousins that made up the Kurukshetra War, and tells the fates of the Kaurava princes (descendants of King Kuru) and the Pandava brothers who fought in the war. The Mahabharata includes the Bhagavad Gita (a dialogue between Prince Arjuna and his charioteer Krishna regarding dharma) which will be covered in detail later as it is not only famous but very influential.
The Mahabharata also includes a story about Damayanti and King Nala (who is possessed by the demon Kali), the oldest version of the story of Savitri and Satyavan (a pure princess and a doomed prince), a version of the story of Rishyasringa (a boy born with the horns of a deer) among other stories. These will also be detailed later on. The text also includes a short version of the Ramayana called “Ramopakhyana.”
The Mahabharata also contains “philosophical and devotional material” such as a discussion of “purushartha” (the four goals of life): dharma (righteousness), artha (prosperity), kama (pleasure), and moksha (liberation or spiritual value.) Dharma is the most important and moksha is the ultimate ideal of life. This is a matter of debate among Hindus, as to which is more important and even whether there is a hierarchy of goals.
There is a disagreement as to which of the four goals should be pursued and how. Some, at one extreme, would say that wealth and pleasure should be renounced for the sake of spiritual liberation. Others say that, depending on one’s age or stage of life, one should pursue one aim or another, but not exclusively.
The second really important post-Vedic text is the Ramayana, dated roughly between the fifth and first centuries BCE.. This work describes the life of Prince Rama. He was exiled to the forest by his father at his step-mother’s urging and spent fourteen years wandering there. He travelled with his wife (the daughter of the earth goddess) and his brother. His wife was kidnapped by a demon king, sparking a war. Eventually, Prince Rama returned to his birth city, Ayodhya (a legendary city but identified with the present-day city.)
The Ramayana is a huge epic, historical on its surface, which describes ideal relationships and presents narrative allegories by Hindu sages. The central characters are also known as gods: Rama (an avatar of Vishnu), and his wife, brother, and other characters are incarnations of various gods. There are multiple versions of the Ramayana in Buddhist, Jainist, and Sikh literature as well as versions specific to India, Nepal, and Southeast Asian countries.
More important post-Vedic texts mentioned in Wikipedia include the Natyashastra, a work on the performing arts (drama and dance.) Then there are the Puranas (“ancient texts”), a vast group of works that include legends and traditional lore. The Puranas cover many topics, to name a few: cosmogony, cosmology, genealogies of gods, kings, and heroes, medicine, astronomy, mineralogy, theology, philosophy, love stories, humor, and folk tales.
The Puranas were composed from the 3rd to the 10th century of the common era and the Hindu versions are anonymous (Jainist Puranas generally have authors and dates.) They are highly influential documents and form the basis for national and regional festivals of Hinduism. However, they are inconsistent and unreliable, particularly in their allegedly historical parts like genealogies.
The Puranas form a huge corpus of varied viewpoints, rituals, and cultural touchstones, suitable for every taste. Their influence on modern Hinduism continues. This group of documents is too individualistic to summarize briefly in a basic post such as this. I will confine myself to a precis of some of the older texts and legends.
Hindu philosophy arises from the roots found in the Vedas and post-Vedic writings. There are six basic orthodox systems of Hindu thought based in the Vedas: Sankhya, Yoga, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Mimamsa and Vedanta. Very briefly, these schools can be described in the following ways:
According to Wikipedia, “Sāmkhya is an enumerationist philosophy whose epistemology accepts three of six pramanas (proofs) as the only reliable means of gaining knowledge. These include pratyakṣa (perception), anumāṇa (inference) and śabda (āptavacana, word/testimony of reliable sources).” The philosophy is described as rationalist, atheist and dualist.
Yoga is quite similar to Samkhya but allows for the existence of god. The text Yoga Vasistha is quoted in Wikipedia: “Yoga is the utter transcendence of the mind and is of two types. Self-knowledge is one type, another is the restraint of the life-force of self limitations and psychological conditioning.” This is entirely different from the modern physical exercise known as “hatha yoga.”
The Nyaya school is described by Wikipedia thusly: “This school’s most significant contributions to Indian philosophy was [sic] systematic development of the theory of logic, methodology, and its treatises on epistemology.” It posits that human suffering is a result of acting under wrong knowledge, and that liberation can be obtained through right knowledge.
Vaisheshika “accepted only two reliable means to knowledge: perception and inference.” It is unique in its exposition of a form of atomism among orthodox schools and in this way resembled the heterodox school of Ajivika.
Mimamsa philosophy refers to a tradition of contemplation reflecting on the meanings of the early Veda texts and ritual actions. It is said to be a form of philosophical realism. It contains several sub-schools.
Vedanta, meaning “end of the Vedas” is said to “reflect ideas that emerged from the speculations and philosophies contained in the Upanishads, specifically, knowledge and liberation.” Vedanta covers many variant schools of thought.
Hindu philosophy also consists in schools that integrate some of the aspects of each of these six orthodox systems of thought. Other philosophies that reject the authority of the Vedas are called heterodox. These include Buddhism (the “middle way”), Jainism (an ascetic sect), Carvaka (materialist and skeptical), and Ajivika (denying free will), to begin with.
I will attempt to go back to the oldest ideas found in pre-Hindu and pre-Veda religious thought in the next post.

Coronavirus studies by Engin Akyurt via pixabay.com
Read this Washington Post update page today. It’s free– no subscription required for COVID-19 articles. Miami-Dade County has closed their beaches for the July 4 holiday. In other news, video surfaced of White House staffers removing social distancing stickers placed on every other seat at the BOK arena prior to the rally held in Tulsa last weekend. The European Union is considering not allowing Americans to visit as tourists when they reopen on the first of July.
Fake face-mask exemption cards are being circulated by a Facebook group. The Washington Post writes:
In an alert, the DOJ said the bogus cards circulating online claim the holder does not have to abide by ordinances requiring face mask usage, claiming that doing so poses a mental or physical health risk. They cite the Americans With Disabilities Act and include a Department of Justice seal and phone number.
“If found in violation of the ADA you could face steep penalties,” the cards say.
They feature an eagle logo and the website for the Freedom to Breathe Agency and caution that businesses or organizations that deny access to cardholders “will also be reported to FTBA for further actions.”
But the FTBA is not a government agency — it’s the Facebook group that shared the cards, CNN reported. Founder Lenka Koloma told the network that people should only wear masks “whenever they wish to be silenced and muzzled.”
After CNN asked Facebook for comment about the group, it was removed, the network reported.

photo by Manfred Antranias Zimmer courtesy of pixabay.com
The Vedas are religious (liturgical) texts; precursors to the texts were passed down in an oral tradition from roughly 1500 BCE on. The texts were first written down in “Vedic” Sanskrit around 500 BCE. Sanskrit is the ancestor of numerous languages spoken and written in India today, it is still used in some Indian villages, and it is taught in many Indian schools. It is the language used in Hindu sacred texts and rituals to this day. Some Buddhist hymns and chants are still spoken in Sanskrit.
The Sanskrit language is known from the beginning of the second millenium, that is 2000 BCE, and was standardized in a treatise on language by an author named Panini (Dakṣiputra Pāṇini) in the mid-first millenium (between 700-400 BCE.) He is known as the “father of linguistics.” Controversy about the exact dates for his life continues; he may have lived as late as Alexander the Great (c. 350 BCE) or as early as 700 BCE. There also is controversy as to the existence of written Sanskrit before his time.
The earliest known examples of written information about Buddhism are in a derivative of Sanskrit called Magadhi Prakrit (as well as some in Greek): the Edicts of Asoka inscribed on stone pillars found all over India. They are dated to the reign of Asoka, 268-232 BCE, and contain references to Buddhism and certain Buddhist precepts or rules of dharma.
Going back to the origins of Hinduism, Wikipedia says: “Vedism refers to the oldest form of the Vedic religion, brought to India by the Indo-Aryans who migrated around 1500 BCE. Brahmanism refers to the further developed form which took shape at the Ganges basin around ca. 1000 BCE.” Brahmanism, when mixed with the non-Vedic religious traditions of the Indo-Aryans of the Ganges plain, became Hinduism.
The Encyclopedia Britannica says, “Brahmanism emphasized the rites performed by, and the status of, the Brahman, or priestly, class as well as speculation about Brahman (the Absolute reality) as theorized in the Upanishads.” The Upanishads were one of the four parts of the Vedas. The Vedas were: the Rigveda, the Yajurveda, the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda. Each Veda had four divisions: “the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and symbolic-sacrifices), the Brahmanas (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the Upanishads (texts discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge).”
Current archaeology holds that the Indo-Aryans of the Sintashta culture migrated from Central Asia into northern India in the period roughly around 2400-1800 BCE. This migration is thought to have something to do with the invention of the “war chariot”, a two-wheeled vehicle with an axle in front that yoked two or four horses. The war chariot utilized a charioteer or driver and could carry passengers or cargo. It was used as a platform for mobile archery in ancient warfare and for travel.
Indian (nationalist) theory holds that there was no migration and that the Indo-Aryans were indigenous to the Ganges plain. This theory is not accepted by outside experts.
The Sintashta were a bronze age culture and there is evidence of intensive copper mining and bronze metallurgy at their archaeological sites. The migration of Sintashta peoples from the area of Kazakhstan may be related to climate change; their lands, already arid, may have become colder and even drier. Much of what is known about Sintashta culture comes from their extravagant burials with quantities of “grave goods” including bronze weapons and tools.
The Sintashta people traded extensively with Iranian and Mesopotamian cultures; their primary export was copper and its alloy, bronze. The best known archaeological site is known as Sintashta, in northern Kazakhstan. At this site, there is evidence of forges where copper ore was smelted and mixed with arsenic to make bronze. The site originally consisted of roughly fifty buildings surrounded by a palisade and a ditch; it is known as a “fortified metallurgical center.” Five cemeteries have been found associated with the site; the funerary sacrifices, including horses, bear strong similarities to the rituals described in the Rig Veda.
These people appear to have migrated south and made contact with another group of peoples associated with what is now called the “Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex” located south of the Amu-Darya River and north of the Hindu Kush, roughly in Afghanistan and southern Turkmenistan. These archaeological sites are known for their impressive fortified structures which are identified as palaces or temples (it is unclear exactly what purpose the buildings served.) The people who lived there practiced irrigated agriculture centered on oases. Their largest settlement may have held as many as 20,000 people in the era around 2400-2000 BCE.
Continuing south (according to currently accepted archaeology) the Sintashta people, who we can now call Indo-Aryans, wound up in northern India around the plain of the Ganges River. The root of the word “Aryan” actually means a “member of one’s own group, in contrast to an outsider”– not unlike the “Indians” of the American Southwest who called themselves “the human beings.” Thus, the term “Aryan” as connoted by racist Western Europeans is something of a self-referent that could be used by any racial group to denote its own people.
These “Indo-Aryans” originally worshipped the god Indra and performed sacrifices called “Yajna” in front of sacred fires. They called themselves “aryas”, meaning “those who performed noble deeds.” Their land was called “Aryavarta”, which is in northern India. The term “Aryas” appears in the Rig Veda and in that document appears to mean “one who sacrifices properly” or one who is pious, as opposed to “aravan” or “not liberal, envious, hostile.”
The religions of India were described by Nehru as collectively called “arya dharma” and include Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism. In Buddhism, the term “arya” refers to one who is noble or a spiritual warrior, and “ārya pudgala” refers to a person who has virtue and has reached a certain level of spiritual awakening.
The denotation of the term “aryan” was altered in popular discourse during the nineteenth century by certain authors who misidentified these Indo-Aryans as coming from northern Germany (or Atlantis) and being blonde and blue-eyed. This has eventuated in the co-opting of the term by racists and its misuse for white nationalism. This is off-topic and may be discussed elsewhere– not here.
The peoples of the Western Ganges plain had a type of pottery called “Black and Red Ware” during the transition from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age, around 1450-1200 BCE. This type of pottery also was popular in the Eastern Ganges area and Central India, and continued for longer, until it was succeeded by the “Northern Black Polished Ware” type around 700-500 BCE. Black and Red Ware is not found west of the Indus Valley.
The Indo-Aryan peoples of the Vedas developed a distinctive form of pottery known as “Painted Grey Ware” which is fine, grey pottery painted with geometric patterns in black. This type of pottery is found in settlements beginning with dates of roughly 1500-700 BCE. It is associated with small to medium sized villages with primitive moats, domesticated horses, ivory working, and the beginnings of iron metallurgy. Rice, barley, millet, and wheat were grown, and cattle, pigs, sheep, and horses were domesticated.
Settlements of this time were built with houses made of mud brick or wattle-and-daub (sticky mixtures on top of woven wood frames.) Larger settlements had paved streets, water channels, embankments, and grain storage buildings. Carbon dating of painted grey ware seems to set its earliest creation around 2000 BCE. There appears to have been gradual growth and enlargement of settlements to city-size during the millenium or so that this type of pottery was used on the Ganges Plain.
Copper was first smelted (as far as we know, since there is no written record) in around 5000 BCE. Smelting bronze from copper and arsenic is first known from 4200 BCE in Asia Minor. Arsenic is frequently an impurity in copper ore, so this combination would have happened naturally. Bronze is much harder than copper, Tin was added to copper first around 2000 BCE; tin is much rarer than other metals, so it was hard to find. Bronze with tin is even harder than ordinary wrought iron.
Smelting iron requires higher temperatures than copper. The first evidence of smelted iron is found around 2000 BCE. Early iron was smelted in a “bloomery” in which the ore is not heated enough to melt the iron but the necessary oxidation-reduction process goes forward with the addition of lime to the ore. When iron ore is smelted, the iron is reduced by reaction with carbon monoxide (which is formed by incomplete burning of charcoal) and it becomes metallic at 1250 °C (2282 °F or 1523.15 K), nearly 300 degrees below its melting point. To reach these temperatures, a charcoal fire must be sustained with forced air in a brick-lined kiln (like those used to fire clay for pottery.)
Once the iron has been reduced from ore (which was iron oxide) into the metallic form, it is a light, spongy mass (bloom) which must be hammered (wrought) down into the final product: wrought iron. Hammering the iron expels the slag (non-iron impurities) and condenses the iron into a hard, ductile mass with a very low carbon content.The first known archaeological evidence of this process comes from Tell Hameh, Jordan, and is carbon-14 dated to 930 BC. This date does not conform to the asserted beginning of the Iron Age in India, however, and I don’t know why that is.
The principal advantage of iron over copper is that iron ores are much more common than copper ores. The disadvantage is the higher heat needed to produce wrought iron– copper melts at 1130 C (2066 F), although it can be smelted at a lower temperature (reduced and extracted from ore, not like melting.) For comparison, a campfire only reaches 600 Celsius (1112 Fahrenheit) while charcoal can reach temperatures of 1100 Celsius or 1260 degrees with forced air.
Making charcoal for smelting was a prime cause of deforestation in ancient and medieval times. Parenthetically, laws were passed in England in the 16th century to prevent the country from being completely denuded of trees. For this reason as well as convenience, people switched to using coal for large scale heating and metallurgy even before the Industrial Revolution.
The transition from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age occurred in northern India during the Vedic period. This was the period in which the religious rituals of Brahmanism and Hinduism were being codified. It is not known when these rituals and the liturgical text were committed to writing, but the original written materials were long ago lost to deterioration, decay, or burning.
The oldest known writing is known independently from Egypt, roughly 3250 BCE, Mesopotamia, between 3400 and 3100 BCE, China, about 2000 BCE, and Meso-America around 650 BCE. Symbols on pottery discovered in Romania are dated to between 4500 and 4000 BCE (known as Vinca symbols), but their significance as writing and authenticity are disputed.
This is part two of a continuing series of posts about ancient India, the roots of Hinduism and Buddhism, and on the ancient world in general.

photo by Manfred Antranias Zimmer courtesy of pixabay.com
The Vedic period in India ran from about 1500 BCE to 500 BCE. The Vedic civilization encompassed a large region of northern India that includes the modern states of Delhi, Haryana, Punjab, and western Uttar Pradesh. The “Indus Valley Civilization” (IVC) preceded the Vedic period and started around 3300 BCE; this earlier civilization was contemporaneous with ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, although it was much larger in area.
The IVC was characterized by urbanization, with dwellings made of baked clay, extensive water supply and drainage systems, and multiple structures not used for dwellings (ceremonial buildings.) The IVC technology used metals including lead, copper, tin, and bronze (copper with 10-20% tin “often with the addition of other metals (such as aluminium, manganese, nickel or zinc) and sometimes non-metals or metalloids such as arsenic, phosphorus or silicon.”) The IVC is known as a Bronze Age civilization.
The decline of the IVC is currently thought to be due to climate change and drought, although there is much uncertainty about earthquakes, an Aryan invasion, and other factors. The archaeological evidence shows that the urban cultures of the IVC were replaced by nomadic, pastoral peoples.
The Vedic period corresponded to the transition from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age. It was characterized by the appearance of the Vedas, liturgical works that form the basis for Brahmanism and the Hindu religion. The Vedas were originally orally transmitted and only written down centuries later. The earliest Veda was called “Rigveda-Samhita” and is thought to have appeared after 1500 BCE.
The Rigveda-Samhita contains accounts of conflicts between Aryan and Dasyu groups of people. According to archaeologists and anthropologists from outside India, the Aryans were immigrants to northern India who brought with them a culture that was different from the Dasyu. According to Indian experts, however, the Aryans were indigenous. The conflicts described in Rigveda-Samhita are semi-legendary and say that the Dasyu were demons who did not sacrifice to the gods or follow their commandments.
Archaeological evidence shows that the Aryans transitioned from a semi-nomadic pastoral way of life to a settled agricultural one during the early Vedic period 1500-1200 BCE. They began to use iron axes and ploughs, and cut down the forests of the Ganges plain to grow crops.
They developed a “varna” system which divided society into four groups: the kshatriya (warriors), Brahmin (priests), vaishyas (free peasants, agriculturalists, or traders), and shudras (slaves or laborers.) A fifth group was called dalits (“broken” or “scattered”) and roughly corresponds to what is today known as the “untouchables.” Some experts says the groups were hereditary; others say that one could change groups depending on circumstances.
There are four Vedas, each of which is divided into four subdivisions. The main Vedas are the Rigveda, the Yajurveda, the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda. “Each Veda has four subdivisions – the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and symbolic-sacrifices), the Brahmanas (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the Upanishads (texts discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge)”
All the Vedas are described as “what is heard” as opposed to “what is remembered” and are thought to be written by superhuman or impersonal means– that is, they are divinely inspired. In modern times, the mantras they contain are recited not for their literal meaning but for their sounds. Reciting the mantras is thought to regenerate the cosmos. Religious traditions that consider the Vedas to be primary authorities are called “astika” (orthodox.)
Religious traditions that deny the primal authority of the Vedas are considered “nastika” (heterodox): these include Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism, Lokayata (materialism), and Ajivika (a school of thought which has been lost but which apparently denies the existence of free will.) There are some details of Ajivika philosophy in a separate page on Wikipedia.
This is the first of a series of posts on the Vedic period in Indian history. They will draw on the relevant documents in Wikipedia to summarize their contents.

Coronavirus studies by Engin Akyurt via pixabay.com
Update: at 12:22 PM Eastern time, the Post reported that Florida had found 8,942 new infections yesterday– eclipsing the record of 5,551 set two days ago.
The Washington Post reported today, June 26:
Nationally, 39,327 new infections were reported by state health departments on Thursday, surpassing the previous record set a day earlier. Texas alone reported a record 5,996 new cases (along with a record high for coronavirus hospitalizations), and the state’s rolling average has jumped by 340 percent since Memorial Day.
Worldometer reported 40,184 new cases in the US for June 25.
The governor of Texas has closed bars and is reducing restaurant capacity, in a reversal of reopening plans set in motion over a month ago. Florida is also announcing bar closures. Nationally, daily new cases have doubled since June 2. The age mix of new cases has changed; younger people are a larger percentage than when the pandemic struck four months ago. LA’s mayor has asked people to stay home as much as possible and announced a near-doubling of test capacity to 13,700 tests per day.
California data showed 56% of positive tests were in patients 18-49 years old and less than 15% were over 65. At the outset of the pandemic, over a quarter of positive tests were found in those over 65, and most deaths were also in this age group.
Centers for Disease Control head Robert Redfield announced that antibody studies reveal the true number of new cases is probably ten times the rate revealed by tests of antigen positivity, suggesting that as many as 20 million Americans have been infected with COVID-19. Most have recovered, but according to worldometer, nearly 127,000 have died. According to Johns Hopkins, there were 124,509 deaths total as of this morning. New Jersey changed its criteria and has reported 1854 probable deaths based on a look back at nursing home data.
According to worldometer, California, Texas, and Florida all have recorded more than 5,000 cases daily, and Arizona has listed over 3,000 new cases.
Overall, new data are showing out of control transmission of coronavirus in the US; even as cases have dropped on the East Coast, they are skyrocketing in the South and West. Despite claims by Republican congressmen that the George Floyd protests are responsible, there is no indication that this is true. Rather, it appears that young people congregating without masks in places like bars is causing this increase.
There has been no well-coordinated federal response to this pandemic. States and local governments have been forced to step up, and they have spent money that they don’t have on mitigation. Since states cannot borrow money, they will be forced to shut down essential services unless the federal government bails them out– which has not happened and is unlikely to happen until the end of July at the earliest.
The same Johns Hopkins site reports 490,632 worldwide deaths and 9,654,269 confirmed cases as of June 26. The US leads the world by a large margin (2,435,814 cases), with Brazil (1,228,114), Russia (619,936), and India (490,401) following. The pandemic is spreading throughout South America with deadly effect and destroying the already fragile economies of South America and Mexico.

Coronavirus studies by Engin Akyurt via pixabay.com
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) today (June 25) published a new document listing risk factors for severe COVID-19 (the disease caused by the virus SARS-COV-2) which separates risky conditions into two categories: those that definitely cause increased risk and those which maybe increase risk.
The following conditions definitely increase one’s risk for severe COVID-19, regardless of age: (they include links to CDC’s information pages on each condition)
- Chronic kidney disease
- COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
- Immunocompromised state (weakened immune system) from solid organ transplant
- Obesity (body mass index [BMI] of 30 or higher)
- Serious heart conditions, such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, or cardiomyopathies
- Sickle cell disease
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus
The CDC describes children who are “medically complex” as having increased risk, as well as those with congenital heart disease, neurologic, metabolic, or genetic conditions.
The second list includes conditions that might increase one’s risk:
- Asthma (moderate-to-severe)
- Cerebrovascular disease (affects blood vessels and blood supply to the brain)
- Cystic fibrosis
- Hypertension or high blood pressure
- Immunocompromised state (weakened immune system) from blood or bone marrow transplant, immune deficiencies, HIV, use of corticosteroids, or use of other immune weakening medicines
- Neurologic conditions, such as dementia
- Liver disease
- Pregnancy
- Pulmonary fibrosis (having damaged or scarred lung tissues)
- Smoking
- Thalassemia (a type of blood disorder)
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus
The two lists appear to differ from previous information in that the first list includes conditions which definitely increase one’s risk of severe COVID-19 and the second list includes conditions with less definite information about increased risk. Regardless of one’s medical conditions, it appears that increasing age increases one’s risk of severe illness in a continuous fashion, that is, there is no definite cut-off below which one is at lower risk.
The rest of the document includes standard information about reducing one’s risk of contracting an infection with the virus: wearing a face mask, washing hands frequently, avoiding touching objects that may be contaminated, and especially avoiding crowds and people you don’t know. There is also advice about low- and high-risk public gatherings, staying healthy generally, getting one’s vaccines including flu vaccines, and following treatment plans for those conditions you already have.
There is a breakdown of specific treatment plans for each chronic medical condition that reiterates standard medical advice for each condition: have a 30-day supply of medication on hand, follow your doctor’s advice, if you don’t have a healthcare provider, get one, quit smoking, and so on. There are no surprises here.
This document appears to be updated in the sense that it separates conditions that definitely increase risks for severe illness from conditions that have less definite risks. I’m not sure what else is has to offer to anyone other than the most naive reader. Perhaps it was released today because there is little else to say that hasn’t already been said.

Electron micrograph of SARS-COV-2 virions in vitro
Several states are reporting record rates of new confirmed cases of COVID-19. These states are mostly in the South and West. Despite efforts in California to enforce mask-wearing and social distancing while reopening, the state has reported records of new confirmed cases in the last few days. Other states, where “stay at home” orders were withdrawn early on (or never instituted), are reporting massive increases. Florida, California, and Texas are among the largest states in the country, and they all have new record increases; rates are rising in 26 states. Hospitalizations are also increasing rapidly, and death rates will not be far behind.
The Washington Post (June 25) reports that areas in which more people watched or listened to conservative news broadcasts (from Fox and Sean Hannity in particular) have shown less compliance with precautions and less appreciation of the pandemic’s severity. These areas are contributing to the spread of the virus because people are not taking it seriously. The Post states:
There are many reasons our response to the pandemic tied to nearly 120,000 U.S. deaths has faltered, experts say, including the lack of a cohesive federal policy, missteps on testing and tracing, and a national culture emphasizing individualism.
It’s not just federal policy and national culture, though– misinformation plays a large role. The article reports on three studies published recently that show people who rely on Fox News and similar media tend to believe more in conspiracy theories and misinformation about the coronavirus. Those who watched Tucker Carlson (who warned viewers early on how severe the pandemic would be) were likely to change their behavior a week earlier than those who watched Sean Hannity (who early on minimized the outbreak and bad-mouthed experts’ recommendations.) As a result, early infections and mortality from COVID-19 were higher in areas where Sean Hannity was more popular.
The group that watched “far-right” media took the virus less seriously and delayed their responses. As the virus spread from hard-hit New York City and Seattle, Washington, rural and conservative parts of the country weren’t prepared. Conservative media continues to play down the severity of the pandemic and to echo the president’s self-serving claim that he has conquered the virus.
California’s record rate of new cases is superficially puzzling because the conventional view of California is that it is full of left-wing zealots; in reality, there are large pockets of extreme right-wing people. Orange County (the home of Richard Nixon) is one example: an attempt to enforce mask-wearing by public health officials there resulted in a backlash and death threats. The county health officer, Dr. Nicole Quick, resigned over death threats after her May 28 order for everyone to wear face masks. Orange County rescinded its mask order on June 11, but California Governor Gavin Newsom instituted an order for the whole state a week later.
The United States is suffering an out of control pandemic. The root cause of this lack of control is the failure of the head of the federal government to institute a plan at the outset. A plan–any plan– would have given people something to start working with. As we know, the prior federal administration left us with a plan– but it was ignored, and nothing was put in its place. The responsibility for this failure lies with the man who wants more than anything to be president but doesn’t want to actually do the things that being president requires.
Instead of coming up with a plan at the outset when he was first warned about the virus, he chose to do nothing. When pressed, he gave the responsibility to the states. When things started to get really bad, he looked for other people to blame. At first, it was convenient for him that places like New York City and Seattle were the hardest hit, because they were hotbeds of liberalism.
Those places, including New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Massachusetts as well as West Coast population centers, are seeing dramatic declines in new cases and relief of the stress on hospitals, apparently due to general adoption of precautions and scientific advice. The South and West are seeing a dramatic rise in new cases, possibly due to misinformation and conspiracy theories spread by Fox News, One America News Network, and other conservative news outlets. Those outlets are taking their cue from the head of the federal government, who has done nothing but blame others.