Skip to content

A child is the index case in 10% of household infections with SARS-COV-2, not statistically significant: MedRxiv and others

EM SARS-COV-2 emerging from apoptotic cells: NIAID

An opinion article in “Medpage Today” on August 3 makes the argument that “it depends” on local infection rates, school mitigation measures, and individual student characteristics as to whether it’s possible to safely open schools for in-person instruction. Let’s look at the research cited in the opinion piece as data supporting some of their arguments.

This paper in MedRxiv was cited as showing that children were the index case in only 10% (3/31) cases of household transmission. That number– 31 cases of household transmission– is too small to help us draw a picture of the tendency of children to pass the novel coronavirus on to members of their households or to their teachers and staff at school. Here are the results from the abstract:

Of the 31 household transmission clusters that were identified, 9.7% (3/31) were identified as having a paediatric index case. This is in contrast other zoonotic infections (namely H5N1 influenza virus) where 54% (30/56) of transmission clusters identified children as the index case.

The article states that they considered the possibility that asymptomatic children were index cases and reported that only 19% of the children were asymptomatic. Other studies show a much larger proportion of asymptomatic cases, even in adults. This leaves open the possibility that asymptomatic children were index cases, who had time to become antigen-negative before cases in the rest of the family were identified.

The other possibility is that adults were more likely to be index cases because children had not yet been exposed through school or their playmates. This would be impossible to evaluate given the nature of the epidemic at that stage.

This is not helpful: a statement by the president on July 30 that “Young people are almost immune to this disease.” As usual, he spreads misinformation, disinformation, and in this case, scientifically inaccurate statements, to further his arguments.

Then there is this article in Nature, which makes this statement in the abstract:

We estimate that susceptibility to infection in individuals under 20 years of age is approximately half that of adults aged over 20 years, and that clinical symptoms manifest in 21% (95% credible interval: 12–31%) of infections in 10- to 19-year-olds, rising to 69% (57–82%) of infections in people aged over 70 years.

The paper uses this information (which is suspect) to make this conclusion: “…interventions aimed at children might have a relatively small impact on reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, particularly if the transmissibility of subclinical infections is low.” We have no idea how transmissible subclinical infections are. If “interventions aimed at children” refers to keeping schools closed, remember that teachers and staff are adults, and they are the ones most at risk. If they catch an infection from an asymptomatic child, the consequences are equally severe, and we don’t know how contagious that child without symptoms may be.

There is much, much more to be considered. For example, did you know that children can excrete the virus in their stool for long periods of time after they have recovered and show no virus in the nose?

This study from China looked at the three children they had whose stools were tested. Two of them had virus in the stool three weeks after they had apparently recovered.

Prolonged shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in stools of infected children indicates the potential for the virus to be transmitted through fecal excretion. Massive efforts should be made at all levels to prevent spreading of the infection among children after reopening of kindergartens and schools.

Then there is this, from a case series of ten children with COVID-19:

Surprisingly, we also noted a high frequency (83.3% [5 of 6 tested]) of 2019-nCoV RNA detection in feces in mild patients and prolonged virus
RNA shedding in feces for at least 2 weeks and even more than 1 month, which raises a question concerning whether the gastrointestinal tract may be another site of viral replication. The impact on 2019-nCoV shedding in feces on transmission model and infection prevention and control should be further assessed.

From these studies, we can see that children often have prolonged shedding of virus in stool. This is a problem for transmission, especially in smaller children who have less ability to separate oral from fecal, uh, tactile exploration, shall we say, delicately. Another area where not enough is known to be confident about school attendance.

This report came from MMWR (part of CDC) online April 6:

Data on signs and symptoms of COVID-19 were available for 291 of 2,572 (11%) pediatric cases and 10,944 of 113,985 (9.6%) cases among adults aged 18–64 years (Table). Whereas fever (subjective or documented), cough, and shortness of breath were commonly reported among adult patients aged 18–64 years (93% reported at least one of these), these signs and symptoms were less frequently reported among pediatric patients (73%). Among those with known information on each symptom, 56% of pediatric patients reported fever, 54% reported cough, and 13% reported shortness of breath, compared with 71%, 80%, and 43%, respectively, reporting these signs and symptoms among patients aged 18–64 years. Myalgia, sore throat, headache, and diarrhea were also less commonly reported by pediatric patients. Fifty-three (68%) of the 78 pediatric cases reported not to have fever, cough, or shortness of breath had no symptoms reported, but could not be classified as asymptomatic because of incomplete symptom information. One (1.3%) additional pediatric patient with a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 was reported to be asymptomatic.

Roughly ten percent of cases of COVID-19 had information on signs and symptoms. Likewise, later in the report it states that roughly 30% of the cases had information on whether the patients were hospitalized. This shows the deep inadequacy of the reporting mechanisms, starting early in the pandemic; at that stage, there were 239,279 cases and 5,443 deaths in the US, already a quarter of the world’s cases although only 1/9 of the world’s deaths.

The bottom line is that we have failed as a country. We didn’t even collect vitally important information about the cases we had in the beginning. Our federal government’s response to this pandemic should have been the best in the world; instead, it is below that of almost all other developed nations and on a par with poor countries like Brazil.

Under these circumstances, returning to school for in-person instruction is worse than foolhardy– it is criminal.

No comments yet

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: