Skip to content

MedRxiv: “Suppression of COVID-19 Outbreak in the Municipality of Vo’ Italy”: testing the whole population found 41% were asymptomatic.


photo of Padua by Gerhard Boegner courtesy of

This article was published in MedRxiv on April 17.  It describes an investigation undertaken in Vo, Italy after a death from COVID-19 was recorded on February 20, 2020.  The entire municipality was tested: “During the two surveys we collected nasopharyngeal swabs from 2,812 and 2,343 subjects, corresponding to 85.9% and 71.5% of the eligible study population…” and found that, on the first survey, 2.6% of tests were positive, while on the second, 1.2% were positive.

During the fourteen days between surveys, the town was placed on quarantine.  “30 out of the 73 individuals (41.1%; 95% CI 29.7-53.2%) who tested positive at the first survey were asymptomatic (i.e. they did not report fever, cough or
any other symptoms, according to the definition used in this analysis). A similar proportion of asymptomatic infection was also recorded at the second survey (13 out of 29, 44.8%; 95% CI 26.5-64.3%); in the 8 new cases, 5 were symptomatic…”

The study found that two-thirds of the patients cleared their infections, in an average of 9.3 days.  59 of the 73 individual positive tests in the first survey were in patients 40 and above; twenty-three of the twenty-nine patients who were positive in the second survey likewise were over 40.  None of the positive tests were in patients under 11 years of age– 234 were tested.  Thirteen new infections were found, five of them in cohabitants (people who lived with others who had infections.)  A total of fourteen patients were hospitalized, and none died.

Overall, the quarantine was effective in preventing most new infections, and the rate of positive tests declined significantly.  Eight new infections were found, several of whom had contact only with asymptomatic patients, and most of whom were infected by family members.  The most important findings of this study were that, first, many of the patients had no symptoms of cough or fever, and second, that most of the infections occurred in middle-aged or older people.

This study agrees with many other surveys of whole populations in finding a large proportion of patients who were asymptomatic.  In a study of a population of cruise ship passengers that I posted before, 81% of the patients had no symptoms.  This makes it difficult to control the pandemic by focusing on people who are ill and present to hospitals with symptoms.  A population-wide approach is necessary, and a large number of asymptomatic people will have to be isolated to prevent tragic results in the small proportion of patients who have severe symptoms.

The implications are serious in that a lot of people will have to be convinced that, even though they are not ill, they could infect others and cause serious illness or death in some cases.  Explaining this to people who are not inclined to follow the advice of experts will be very difficult.  Americans, especially, will be hard to convince– there is a large group of people in this country (perhaps 40% of the population) who do not trust experts.  In other places like Europe and Asia, most people accept expert guidance, but not in the US.  The results will be catastrophic; many will die because some are not just skeptical but dismissive of expert advice.

No comments yet

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: